펄스UV 세정/표면개질시스템, PULSE UV CLEANING / SURFACE TREATEMENT

UV경화 / 세정 시스템	적외선 건조시스템	펄스UV경화 시스템	제논 조사장치	내후성 시험장비	광계측 분석기기	솔라셀 제조장비


UV 경화 시스템, 모듈형 UV 경화시스템 UV 세정 시스템 UV 노광 시스템 SPOT UV, UV LED FLOOD UV 외	MIR / NIR 건조시스템 적외선 건조시스템 IR / 열풍 건조시스템 소성로 (FIRING FURNACE)	펄스UV 경화 시스템 펄스UV 세정 시스템 외	제논 조사장치 75W, 100W, 150W 200W, 300W, 1 kW 3 kW ~ Max. 15 kW	내후성 시험장비 WEATHER TESTER 기타 주문형 시험장비	광량계, 광계측기 광분석시스템 광모니터링 시스템 외	솔라셀 제조장비 SOLAR FIRING SOLAR SIMULATOR (CELL, MODULE) SOLAR CELL PRINTING


X-UV 시스템	램프 및 기타제품	광신터링 시스템	스크린 인쇄 시스템	수처리 살균 시스템	LED / BLU 검사장비	엔지니어링


X-UV 경화 시스템 PHOTONIC ACTIVATION X-UV 살균, 세정 외	MIR / NIR 램프, 제논램프 펄스UV램프 솔라시뮬레이션 램프 외	X-LIGHT 신터링 시스템 X-LIGHT 어닐링 시스템 PHOTONIC CURING SYS	평면 스크린인쇄 시스템 (자동, 반자동, 인라인)	펄스UV 수처리 시스템 펄스UV 살균 시스템	LED BLU 휘도 검사시스템 LED 조도 검사시스템 SWIR검사, X-RAY검사 NEUTRON 검사시스템	솔라셀 제조 라인 인쇄 코팅, 전처리, 건조, 경화 생산 라인 롤 코터 / DIP 코터 라인




펄스UV 세정 시스템 (PULSE UV CLEANING)										Home > Pluse UV System > Pulse UV Cleaning

	PULSE UV 개요
	펄스 UV 경화기술의 개요
	펄스 UV 경화의 장점
	펄스 UV 적용분야

	펄스 UV 경화
	펄스 SPOT UV 조사기
	펄스 UV 모듈시스템 (소형)
	펄스 UV 경화시스템 (중대형)
	펄스 UV 경화시스템 사양 (중대형)

	PULSE UV 세정 / 표면처리 / 개질
	펄스 UV 세정 / 표면처리 시스템

	기술자료

펄스UV 표면 세정 / 표면개질 시스템 (PULSE UV SURFACE CLEANING / DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM)

Non-Contact Surface Treatment

Pulsed UV can be used as a non-contact polymer and metal surface treatment, as reported by Prof. Lawrence T. Drzal, Composite Materials & Structures Center, Dept. of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University (USA).

Paint and adhesive performance depends on the quality (cleanliness and surface energy) of the substrate (adherent) surface. Disadvantages of existing surface pretreatment methods like plasma, flame, corona, and solvent washing are labor intensive, time consuming, damage to the adherent surface, and emission of volatile organic compounds. Many polymers used as matrices for polymer composites are being investigated. Figure 8 obtained at MSU within the past year with a wide range of thermoset and thermoplastic polymers illustrates the significant improvements in surface energy that can be obtained and that have resulted in better wetting of plastic surfaces by adhesives and coatings, and substantial increase in adhesion of UV treated surfaces as measured by a tensile butt test to an epoxy matrix. Polymers investigated have included thermoplastic as well as thermoset matrices. Although this group of polymeric matrices represents some of the materials commonly used in industry (TPO, Polypropylene, Polyester, Polycarbonate, Poly Phenylene Sulfide, Poly methylmethacrylate and vinyl ester), the breadth of applicability of this pulsed UV treated method indicates that it has a high potential of being very useful with other materials as well.

.Thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO).

.Reactor Grade (RTPO).

.Mechanical grade (MTPO)

.Sheet molding compound (SMC) .

.Regular (SMC1).

.Toughened (SMC2)

.Polyphenylene Sulphide (PPS).

.White (PPS1).

.Black (PPS2)C

.Polypropylene (PP)

.Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT)

.Bulk Molding Compound (BMC)

.Diene rubber (DR)

.Ethylene Acrylic Rubber (EAR)

.Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)

.Vinyl Ester (VE)

.Polycarbonate (PC)

.Bexloy (Ionomer) Composite

Figure 8: Samples treated with pulsed UV (Figure provided by Prof. Lawrence T. Drzal)

A model including the important parameters of this UV surface treatment and comparison of methods are shown in Figures 9 and 10 respectively. The flexibility of pulse light delivery to the substrate (i.e., pulse recurrence frequency, pulse duration, and spectrum) brings “tuning” possibilities to various substrates. Pulsed UV meets the need for a continuous, environmentally benign, fast, cost effective and non-contact surface preparation process.

Figure 9: Parameters for surface treatment process model. (Figure provided by Prof Lawrence T. Drzal)

	Conventional Surface Treatments (Flame, Corona, Plasma, Chemical)	Pulse UV Surface Treatment
Current Status	Flame, Corona and Chemical Wash are main stream surface treatment technologies. Plasma - limited acceptance.	Developing technology - Equipment manufacturing base exists
Environmental Impact	Chemical - VOC emission, waste disposal Corona - High levels of ozone produced. Flame - Greenhouse gases, organic fuels.	Very low levels of ozone produced incontained environment.
Ability to Treat Complex Geometries	Flame, Corona and Plasma Treatments have severe limitations in treating complex geometries.	Line-of-sight treatment. Potential to treatcomplex geometries is excellent.
Treatment Time	Corona Flame - Very fast treatment times Chemical, Plasma - Moderate treatment times	Fast treatment times(Time scales inversely with lamp power)
Hazards	Chemical - human exposure, waste disposal Corona - very efficient Ozone production	UV protection for humans
Cost	Corona Flame, Chemical - Inexpensive Plasma - Expensive	Inexpensive
Suitability in Manufacturing Environment	Corona, Flame - Web treatment applications.Removal of process gases required. Chemical - Adverse environmental impact, hazardous. Plasma - Unsuitable for large scales.	Excellent suitability for all applications. flat, complex geometries, large scale.Minimal hazards. UV protection,Removal of low levels of ozone required

Figure 10: Comparison of conventional surface treatment and pulsed UV. (Figure provided by Prof. Lawrence T. Drzal)